Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Oliver Crawford vs Daniel Labrador Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Crawford vs Labrador analysis and find out who is favored!
Oliver Crawford vs Daniel Labrador Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Crawford has won 48.94% of points on his second serve, while Labrador has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Crawford, in recent form, has won 52.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Labrador has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.29% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Crawford has saved 61.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Labrador has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Crawford has won 65.43% of matches played (W/L 53/ 28), with Labrador winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Crawford has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 153/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Labrador has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Crawford has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 79.07% of matches (W/L 34/ 9), where as Labrador has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Crawford winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Crawford winning 2 and Labrador winning 0. The last match between Crawford and Labrador was at the M25 Naples, 29-10-2019, Q3, Clay with Oliver Crawford getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Crawford and Labrador have played a deciding set 0 times, with Crawford winning 0 times and Labrador 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Crawford winning 0, and Labrador 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Crawford has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.06 while Labrador has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Crawford has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Labrador has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Crawford has converted 40.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Labrador has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Crawford 1 - 0 Labrador
195
Rank
190
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
68% (245-114)
Career Total W/L
50% (9-9)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Oliver Crawford | Daniel Labrador |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (23/35) | 59% (24/41) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (18/23) | 42% (10/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 92% (11/12) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (24/41) | 17% (6/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Oliver Crawford
Player
Daniel Labrador
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Oliver Crawford | Daniel Labrador |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (27/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (257/251) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.3 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (940/1567) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (667/940) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (310/627) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (64/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (642/1626) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Oliver Crawford Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Oliver Crawford
51%
(
50 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Oliver Crawford
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Oliver Crawford
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Oliver Crawford
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Hady Habib
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Dmitry Popko
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
6
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Oliver Crawford
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Oliver Crawford
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Labrador Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Daniel Labrador
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Labrador
Player
Mehdi Laalej
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Daniel Labrador
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
view more
Crawford Vs Labrador Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
